Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘social enterprise’

Andrew Lansley was continually challenged by a frequently angry audience during last week’s Question Time debate. The Health and Social Care Bill has been pushed through at break neck speed. I sense a genuine fear of what looks like an increasingly inevitable outcome – a similar experience to that of the DWP’s Work Programme; great promises of a meaningful and modernizing role for the third sector but a reality where a small number of big businesses dominate. After all they are well capitalised, capable of achieving huge economies of scale, too big to fail, and they will of course deliver the efficiencies we all so desire and desperately need. After all, it did work with the energy sector, bus and rail de-regulation didn’t it? No.

Excessive profiteering, as we have seen in all of these areas, occurs when there are too few competitors, not when there are too many. Unfortunately Whitehall often has a very short memory.

A revolution in commissioning was promised by the last government, as it is by the current. Waiting for a great leap forwards in commissioning is likely to be the equivalent of waiting for a gentle and delicate Wayne Rooney to emerge out of the tunnel at Old Trafford. Chris White’s Bill could play an  important role in evolving commissioning but it won’t create the revolution we need all by itself. Strong US style anti-trust laws might help protect against the natural yet damaging monopolies that form when policy and commissioning favours only big business.

What’s more likely to have an impact is the sort of collapse of faith in big business ethics by consumers and more importantly voters that the protests across the world over the weekend suggest is beginning to emerge.  Before last Thursday’s Question Time debate got going there was a fascinating story about the 99% campaign camps set up in US towns and cities. From humble beginnings and a simple gathering on Wall Street, the movement has spread rapidly and appears to be developing rapidly across the UK too. The protesters call it a movement rather than a protest and are calling for a conversation on rampaging social and financial inequality. The campaign is centred on business ethics; excessive profiteering by global companies, business being bailed out by tax payers, avoidance of tax, over-exploitation of our natural resources and our communities.

It’s perhaps captured an underlying public mood – one that is growing, particularly in the developed world. Business has to change the way it operates; the siphoning off of ever-greater profits to a small, exclusive, globally-mobile elite must stop. The protestors argue that governments around the world have been far too complicit in enabling this globalized business culture to grow unchallenged. Now you’ll know from my last blog that I’m in favour of working with corporate partners where a meaningful relationship can be developed but the opportunity to co produce with value-driven businesses tends to be a growing yet still marginal opportunity rather than the norm – particularly within the foggy world of international capital and trading markets.

I’m currently travelling back from a meeting with PM training in Stoke on Trent. They work with around 1000 people each year providing training and high quality apprenticeships. I’ve blogged about them before. They’ve grown from a £2m to a £7m business in a short while. Last year 95% of their trainees (most of whom have faced multiple challenges in their early lives) completed their courses and, most importantly, secured work. It’s an inspiring organisation that continues to buy up private businesses and convert them into social enterprises. They have 42 homework teams providing garden and home maintenance to 5000 households of elderly and disabled people each year. They show exactly what can be done by socially-driven local businesses. In terms of outcomes they are capable of completely outperforming any big corporate and yet they are excluded from a range of government procurement opportunities because of their modest size or because the business case for them acting as sub-contractor-to-prime just doesn’t stack up. A report in the Mail on Sunday shown to me by Will, PM’s Chief Exec exposed how the apprenticeship programme is simply using taxpayers’ cash to provide existing staff within the big supermarkets with training labelled as adult apprenticeships rather than creating new jobs and training opportunities. It said that Asda alone has 25000 taxpayer-supported adult apprenticeships on the go, and not a single new job created as a result. Can’t the big supermarkets afford the cost of their own staff training? Wouldn’t it be better value to invest in the like of PM Training to expand their excellent work – safe in the knowledge that any profit they generate from public money would get reinvested into local communities, job creation and growth?

Is it any wonder people are angry on Question Time and taking to the streets in cities across the world?

Things aren’t changing fast enough and without much more ambitious thinking we know we will end up with more business-as-usual. The localism agenda needs to get a whole lot more radical. Collectively social enterprises must engage with the public and explain that they are part of the economic solution our world and our communities desperately need. Our new ‘Society Profits’ campaign aims to enable social enterprises and their supporters across the UK to do just that. Join our campaign, spread the word and show the angry and frustrated citizens around the world that a new, fairer economy can and will exist if we all collectively demand it. As you know that new economy must be built with social enterprise at its foundations.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

August is over, my tomato plants look tired after a long and successful summer harvest, the kids are heading back to school, the Libyan democrats have taken control of Tripoli (that’s Libyan, not Liberal, just in case you thought you’d missed something), and the evenings have begun to get depressingly shorter. I’ve even started using my lights on my cycle home.

There are lots of things to consider in the wake of the summer‘s civil unrest and a desperate need to constructively respond to the challenges they pose and not to just simply walk on by.  How we might remedy the inequality that now exists in Britain (and shows no sign of slowing – on this we’re up there with the US as the most unequal Western countries) and create opportunities and brighter futures for our young and disaffected communities, needs to be addressed. Based on requests from our membership and a fired up staff team, this is something we’ll be trying to tackle at our youth focused policy debate at the fantastic social enterprise PJ’s Community Services in Croydon on September 28th.  We’ll be capturing the thoughts of young people and social enterprise leaders, and presenting their thoughts and ideas back to politicians in the coming weeks and months.

I think there’s a risk that systemic unfairness could become accepted in Britain, and deemed impossible to change. The young have been demonised for a while now, but it seems that we’ve also started demonising the undeserving poor.  Not always helped of course by the spinning activities of our politicians (I’m not talking about an exercise class here). Today, the reoffending rioters are being called a feral underclass by our justice secretary, as if that’s really going to help, and not that long ago Polly Toynbee raised the issue. A government press release detailed the top ten excuses given by ‘benefit cheats’.  The real story is that fraud costs £1.6billion, just 0.7% of the benefits bill.  The story was covered on BBC television news that bank holiday weekend in late May – and the stats weren’t quoted – so imagine the millions of people who were exposed to the scaremongering. It only served to play on people’s fears, pitting the mainstream against the UK’s poor, stirring up unnecessary feelings of anger and hatred, and dividing society.

All the political parties promoted principles of fairness in their election campaigns, so what’s actually been done to try and achieve a fairer, kinder society? How far have we got?

Job insecurity, flat lining wages, unaffordable housing, poor pension prospects, increasing crime rates – all suggesting not that far, and there’s not much in the way of policy that suggests it’s going to get any better. We need a revolution and that revolution needs to start here, within the social enterprise movement. We need to be bolder, more evangelical, we need to shout from the roof tops, phone into radio debates and be heard.

Good on those who defended young people in the media recently. I heard a charity youth worker call into LBC radio, and my lovely Mum wrote into the Daily Mail getting a mention for social enterprise!  Thank goodness for the voices of people like this who suggest ways in which we can remedy the country’s problems without wanting to dish out blame.  Social enterprises have many solutions and ideas and now is no time to be reticent; we need to keep the debate alive and relevant.

Social enterprise helps create a fair and prosperous economy. Germany has a much more plural basis for its economy; ownership is more equally shared and is richer, more resilient as a consequence.  Social enterprises don’t just create wealth for their owners, but create and share wealth for others too.

If we in the UK simply continue in our sole pursuit of growth without considering how we also tackle inequality we’ll all be worse off.  Research shows that in more unequal societies it’s not just the poor who are miserable, it’s the rich too.  We know that there’s no correlation between GDP and happiness.

While on the subject of mental wellbeing, happiness was not an emotion that my friend (a lifelong Arsenal supporter) was feeling after his team’s shocker of a defeat to Manchester United. Almost weeping into his pint (not really, but I’m sure some fans did) he told me that he’d not bought a season ticket this year because the price had gone up yet they’d sold two of their best players.  “It’s all about the shareholders”, he said.

I suggested that more clubs follow the lead of AFC Wimbledon because football had lost its way, was crapping all over the fans, and that money was ruling and ruining the game.  “It’s a nice idea, but it’ll never happen,” came his reply.

I disagree – and I’d be in the wrong job if I didn’t think that the Premier League could feature more employee-owned clubs, or that business could be kinder. Too many people seem to be of the belief that ethics in business are an aside, a luxury to the brutal way that most business must unfortunately be done.

My diary is jam packed between now and Christmas.  My days are going to be long (can you hear the violins?). But seriously, I’m not complaining, not at all.  At Social Enterprise UK HQ we’re seeing an upsurge in interest – potential start-ups looking for advice, social enterprises realising that they’re part of a movement (it still amazes me how many organisations there are out there that don’t realise they’re actually a social enterprise), but perhaps most interestingly, big corporates are knocking on our door wanting to know how they can get into the world of social enterprise.

I think my next blog is going to talk about why social enterprise needs to work more closely with the corporate world.  We’re not going to change the face of UK business unless we work with those already in it, are we?

Read Full Post »

I didn’t want to write about the riots. It seemed somehow too opportunistic but there are things that have been whirring around my mind, disturbing my sleep and creating a growing sense of frustration.  I feel compelled  to start any contribution regarding the riots with the prerequisite condemnation of violence and  and assertion that there can be no excuses. My failure to do so on my Facebook updates led to some pretty angry comments. I naively thought that it went without saying that there are no excuses for such destructive actions – that now said,  we sooner rather than later need to move the debate on. We have to go beyond righteous indignation and the language of feral youth, rubber bullets and army interventions if we are going to change rather than simply contain these destructive types of behaviours. There are causes that are deeply engrained within the society we have created.  We have created in our towns and cities  communities of young people that are hopeless – lacking in hope. A generation that believe that they can only command dignity, self value and the  respect of their peers by what they are able to wear and consume, a generation that has aspiration but no belief in their abilities to achieve the celebrity  lifestyles that are so aggressively marketed to them, represented across our media in magazines, sports pages, advertising, news, film and tv. The traditional mechanisms of achievement – working hard, relevant education and contributing to our communities are no longer perceived to offer the opportunities to succeed in life.  Many that exist within these communities  have a belief that greed is good and taking what you want by whatever means is acceptable, is perhaps the only way to get what we’re told we need. A view that is too frequently endorsed and echoed across society and by adult role models everywhere – everyone’s on the take and so why don’t we just take it. Expenses scandals and the banking crisis have only served to expand and mainstream these notions. Popular television programmes like The Apprentice and Dragon’s Den perpetuate the principle that it’s money that matters above all else. Our power to buy and consume defines us and is the only relevant measure of success.

Our political leaders have been complicit in this messaging. Money and the ability to buy what we want whenever we want is all we apparently want. Peter Mandelson was entirely relaxed about people becoming filthy rich, the current administration and indeed the shadow cabinet seem to demonstrate that money is a critical factor in achieving a good education, good prospects, power and success. You’ve probably got more chance of winning the lottery than of ‘making it’ if you’re from a poor background, have useless parents and attend a sink school.  And the evidence is flooding in that cuts are hitting certain people with disproportionate ferocity; the young, the poor and the black communities are not faring well, although they are by no means the only ones that have very nearly lost it all.

When at Sunlight I worked with lots of young people some of whom who would frequently be labelled as ‘chavs’ – a miserable term for young poor people. One young guy, just 17,  had absent parents, no qualifications, a drug, drink and thieving habit and no permanent home. He was heavily criminalised – peddling stolen stuff, drugs and was happy to risk everything by robbing and dealing because in his view he had nothing left to lose and no real opportunity to get what he thought he wanted from life. This lad is now an FA-qualified footie coach and runs 4 weekly football teams. He’s now a responsible father of 2 children and an influential role model, a community leader and a friend to scores of young people in a very challenged, highly deprived community. He plays the role of parent to many. Well he does now, but won’t be able to in just four weeks’ time. The contracts he had through the extended schools programme, his employment through his local development trust, bits of additional funding he sourced through a patchwork of small grants that paid for kits, match fees and transport are all evaporating bit by bit, leading to the closure of the project and the end of his job. The temptation to return to less productive ways of living will not suck my friend back into his old ways but I can’t be so sure that the same is true for those who rely on him.

Today I visited one our members in Harlesden NW London. What Jennifer and her crew at Bang achieve is astonishing, hundreds of young people engaged in projects that meet their individual needs and talents. Jennifer is constantly having to use her creativity to crawl through the hoops and processes that her customers and funders create. It gets in the way of meeting the needs of young people. She and her team are expected to transform lives within the contracted 30 hours of contact which they get. Not 30 hours a week, not 30 hours a month but just 30 hours. That 30 hours of funding is expected to take a frequently cynical, beaten, unmotivated young person lacking in basic skills and develop them into a work-ready, reliable, purposeful person. Jennifer describes many of the young people with whom she works as people born without any known reason for their lives.

It’s easy to feel sad and pessimistic. But Jennifer asked me to do something. She asked that I search for funding that will enable young people from within our most disadvantaged communities to set up their own social enterprises. “If we all work this way in the future then we’ll be alright, if we continue to work like the banks and normal businesses then we won’t,” she says. “The good thing about setting up a social enterprise is that you can’t lose. Even if your business goes under then you still haven’t lost. You’ll have business skills, social skills, connections and you’ll understand you have a purpose and a reason for your life – I set one up  because I knew I couldn’t lose.”

The government needs to be radical – they need to link social and economic policy, we need to move away from business as usual because business as usual has failed our most challenged communities for decades and has more recently shattered our economy for good.  A more balanced and plural economy with social enterprise at its heart will not only radically improve the way public services are delivered but could create the opportunities and most importantly, hope. Opportunity, mobility and hope offer the only real solutions to what the recent violence has highlighted – social dysfunction on a grand scale.

Peter

Read Full Post »

There was something quite delicious in seeing a social enterprise newspaper (for me the Guardian with its ownership sitting with the Scott Trust is a social enterprise, however they describe themselves!) be value led, tenacious, committed, and ultimately seek to protect democracy and ensure that the laws of the land are applied to all, no matter what their position in our society.

I know the rolling news can become repetitive and as a result a wee bit tiresome, but let us never forget just how serious this piece of news is. It’s not about celebrities’ right to privacy being infringed. It’s not even about the appalling and unbelievable decisions made to invade the lives of families affected by dreadful crimes. It’s about a private company having vast influence, verging on control of our democracy, having been exposed.  Well done to The Guardian, Chris Bryant MP, Norman Fowler MP and Tom Watson MP – all of whom were under all sorts of pressure to back down and go away.

But whilst the story keeps unravelling, other pieces of news have been almost entirely lost. The ‘opening public services’ white paper emerged yesterday with more of a whimper than a bang. We were all mightily frustrated. We worked hard to make the voice of social enterprise be heard; we were even lined up be on Radio 4 Today, then the PM programme, but the story was dropped at the last minute as more News International revelations emerged. One might say a good day to bury bad news.

The white paper (though actually positive in parts) poses as serious a threat to our public services and to the vision of a more plural economy in which social enterprises can grow their contribution to economic and social recovery – and demonstrate that Big Society isn’t just about volunteering.

I’m concerned that these proposed reforms will create an unequal playing field in which social enterprises are unable to compete with large private sector providers for public sector contracts.  In too many instances we still struggle to find the capital required or do not have the scale to compete with big private businesses in public sector markets, where the commissioning process favours the big – and by design excludes the small and the medium.

The frustration of government that a public sector monopoly stifles efficiency, innovation and value will not be resolved by replacing a public sector monopoly with a private sector oligopoly. It hasn’t worked in transport deregulation or the introduction of competition following the privatisation of our utilities.  And the risks of getting it wrong in other parts of the public sector are very, very serious.

Yes reform is necessary, but these plans must protect our shared interests in public services, not put them at risk.  Without the necessary safeguards, these proposals will allow big private providers to dominate public sector markets.  Taxpayers’ money will flow into profit seeking organisations that exist only to satisfy the needs of their shareholders.  Public services must operate for the communities and people they serve, nobody else.

The Government’s plans to extend Payment by results will put private sector organisations at an automatic advantage.  They’ll simply use their stronger balance sheets and ability to attract private investment to win contracts.

We only have to look to the Department for Work and Pensions Work Programme to see that when markets open up, large private sector providers move in and squeeze out smaller organisations.  A tiny proportion of the contracts went to social enterprises despite it being hailed by Government as a boost for the Big Society. What happened to the WISE group in Scotland was scandalous and had their whole value been considered within their tender they would surely have romped home to victory.  Their smaller size and access to capital was their downfall, NOT the quality, design or track record in delivery – all of which I know were outstanding.

A You Gov poll carried out for us shows that people do not want the private sector to run public services.  Our research was carried out before the Southern Cross debacle and there’ll be even more cynicism now about big corporations and their involvement in our national treasures.  It is encouraging that the majority of those surveyed said they wanted public services to be run by social enterprises.  We hope the politicians are taking note of this public opinion.

The important question now is how serious is the Government’s want for social enterprises and mutuals to play a bigger role in public service delivery.  The country’s policy makers need to lever in investment and infrastructure to ensure that there are enough of them in the marketplace able to deliver.  But the £10million support programme announced by ministers last year to do just that, has not yet materialised.  It’s an anxious waiting game.

I am aware that social enterprises out there delivering public services share my fears. A few glimpses of the trends emerging from the forthcoming state of social enterprise survey – due early August – say they are.  We are all becoming increasingly uneasy if the opportunities promised by Government will materialise:

  • Social enterprises trading mainly with the public sector anticipate they will make half of all the likely redundancies within the social enterprise business community over the next 12 months.
  • Social enterprises doing most of their business with the public sector view the coming years with gloom, with markedly lower business confidence than their social enterprise peers trading with consumers and private businesses.
  • Of the social enterprises trading mainly with the public sector, two-thirds anticipate that their growth will come from diversifying away from working with the public sector (64%).

These are sombre findings in tough times.  But we won’t give up the fight.

Till next time.

Peter

Read Full Post »

A recently-retired senior civil servant emailed me recently, saying “I have a smallish but not insignificant sum to invest and you’ve sold me the social enterprise vision. What investment opportunities exist within the sector – do you know of any?” at moments like this the realities of connecting demand and supply – both exciting and depressing – come crashing in.

Access to more mainstream capital is critical if we are going to realise our ambitions for social enterprise. While many incredible social enterprises don’t have an appetite or ambition for turbo-charged growth, many, many do. While it’s true that the Co operative Group has grown its business only through reinvesting its own profits, plenty in our movement don’t want to wait decades to realise the growth they could achieve if capital were more accessible.

Of course the Big Society Bank is a welcome addition but let’s be realistic. It’s not and will never be the whole answer to our needs.

The much-discussed Social Stock Exchange perhaps provides a bigger opportunity for us. We know there are people out there who live ethical lives; consumer trends suggest that this market is resilient and growing. But while it’s easier and easier to buy with a conscience how easy is it to invest with the same level of diligence? Although ethical savings and pension funds are now more common I question just how ethical these are. I have a small green pension fund but I suspect it’s a very pale shade of green.

A social stock exchange could be a game changer – it could bring together successful socially beneficial enterprises and connect them to sources of investment that are hungry for a blended return.

We have nearly a million people working within the sector who could be potential investors, we have any army of supporters across other sectors, we have charities with large reserves in traditional and often dirty investment portfolios and billions of pounds in local authority investments. This money could be working for our communities, stimulating growth and innovation rather than simply looking for the highest and often risky financial return (remember local authority Icelandic investments anyone?). A social stock exchange could realise the level of investment in our sector that we need to fuel growth and exploit opportunity – and most social investors would be happy with bonds rather than simple equity – so ownership and values need not be compromised in the process. I’m supporting Pradeep and Mark in the creation of the Social Stock Exchange – I’m hoping you do too.

On a slightly different note I thought Monday’s FT article on future outsourcing was very revealing. The big companies that churn billions of pounds of tax payers money simply don’t see the wider sector as a threat:
“there is no way on the planet that these contracts are going to be let to a charity…the (charitable) sector will not be a massive player in the delivery of public services as they “simply don’t have the scale and can’t bear the risk of things going wrong.”

They could be right but, as any smart cookie knows, you should never underestimate your competitors. This sort of lazy complacency may well be their future Achilles heel. Of course we recognise that scale and capitalization remain major challenges for us but we are developing fast – new ideas around Social Enterprise LLP’s, new bonds, growing public awareness, lord Hodgson’s red tape task force for charities and social enterprises , ever growing evidence of our sector’s resilience, economic success and social value are putting us in an increasingly better place SO, despite the dreadful economic circumstance the future could still be ours. Our soon-to-be launched State of Social Enterprise survey will reveal some reasons to be cheerful and some reasons to feel very proud. More to follow on that one!

Finally I was in Edinburgh last week to meet peers from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Exciting stuff is happening in Scotland where a net increase in resources for the sector has been announced. It appears rhetoric is turning into reality in Scotland. New opportunities are emerging in Wales although the cuts are hitting poorer communities incredibly hard and the Northern Ireland Assembly are slowly but surely waking up to the role of social enterprise in developing a robust and resilient mixed economy. Across the UK nations we have agreed to work more closely than ever, syndicate content, develop closer policy alignment and do much more co-production than ever before.

We finished the meeting with a visit to St Jude’s laundry which Forth Sector has recently acquired. An amazing place providing the cleanest, freshest laundry to corporate and private customers – it even has a royal warrant.

It was a great way, once again, to reconnect with the values, innovation, impact and diversity of the sector. It currently employs around 40 staff. A thriving, competitive, viable business that is working with some of the most marginalised people in our society. It has ambition, it has soul, it has happy customers and I’m in no doubt it has a great future.

Read Full Post »

Pat Samuels, with a career and experience spanning 26 years departed the Cabinet Office today to take early retirement. One of a number of senior civil servants who have also opted for an early exit.

Pat has been nothing less than brilliant, leaving the treasury to join, support and perhaps even lead the civil society movement through her often too subtle role within the CO. Colleagues, friends and her husband joined the massed ranks of everything that is good in civil society to say thank you to Pat.

Whilst the Voluntary and Community Sector praised her with warm rhetoric it was the social enterprise movement that moved from rhetoric to delivering the goods; in this case the goods were treats from Jamie’s Fifteen restaurant. Oven gloves, an apron and a fab bottle of rose were presented in recognition of Pat’s work in helping shape the social enterprise policy agenda.

It was good to see Stephen Bubb there, and Stuart Etherington with the NCVO posse, but the event was severely lacking in ministerial representation, which Pat should have clearly commanded. A good night, but unfortunately it was as subtle and as low key as Pat would have wanted, but surely didn’t deserve.

Read Full Post »

I left for South Africa with the sad news that the WISE group had been unsuccessful with their bid to DWP. Their performance on previous DWP contracts had been outstanding – a shining example of what social enterprise can achieve, a high performer that not only gets people back to work, but does so by improving whole lives and regenerating communities.

The winning prime contractors have committed to between a 3%-7% third sector supply chain. Is DWP out of step with the Government’s commitment that 25% of public spending will go to SME’s, and that as the Queen stated in her opening of parliament charities, co-operatives and social enterprises will play a bigger role in public service? I’ll let you be the judge of that.

We’ll be working with the WISE group to ensure that DWP fully understand the missed opportunity that this decision has created. As I’ve said before, we don’t want unfair advantage, but we want a level playing field and for the added value that we create to be recognised within the commissioning frameworks.

So I arrived in Johannesburg for the 4th World Social Enterprise Forum and it wasn’t the best first impression. I got into a taxi with two fellow speakers who had flown in from Italy. Our driver, who had left his car in a zone that clearly stated ‘No stopping’, was given a ticket. An angry exchange between the driver and the policeman followed, before he got into the car and said: ‘If I was black he wouldn’t have given me a ticket, he’s is a fascist’. The three of us spontaneously and angrily pounced upon him and we spent the rest of the journey without a sound from him. ‘Is this really representative of the new South Africa?’ I thought.

Opening of the 2011 Social Enterprise World Forum

Opening of the 2011 Social Enterprise World Forum in Johannesburg

The World Forum brings together hundreds of speakers, delegates, activists, policy wonks and politicians from right around the world. It’s not only an information and learning exchange, the forum acts as a catalyst for social enterprise development in whatever territory it lands. Sometimes it’s a whole country that’s affected and sometimes such as in Africa a whole continent that benefits. The UN were present, the world bank, international NGOs and many people who are tirelessly running inspiring social enterprises in some of the harshest economic circumstances anywhere in the world.

Jay Naidoo (Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition and previous cabinet minister of South Africa), Professor Kovin Naidoo (International Centre for Eyecare Education), Futhi Mtoba (Deloitte Chair and Business SA President) were just some of the impressive speakers on this year’s programme. Ten people from UK social enterprises were also there including Alex from the Grow Organisation, Margaret from the WISE Group, Ian from Pluss, Verity from FRC Group, Neil from the Social Enterprise Academy, John from Welsh SEC, and Kelly from Voluntary Action Highland. Everyone I spoke to from the UK and beyond appreciated the value and power of attending.

The conference ran for four days, one set aside for issues specific to Africa. We came away with commitments to work with our African friends to help develop a better social enterprise infrastructure, to help build a bigger movement based on community-owned economic development and to help catalyse a rebalancing of international grant aid to sustainable social enterprise investment.

After the conference I joined the international group tour, the programme excellently developed by Gerry Higgins, and expertly organised and managed by Lindsey – both from CEiS. Korea, USA, Canada, Australia and Germany were all represented in the group which helped maintain a pretty global perspective throughout the tour programme. SHAW Co is a social enterprise delivered from within the University of Cape Town and has a huge impact through a range of interventions across the townships of Cape Town. They are running exceptional nursery provision (I’m hoping that June from LEYF might want to develop a relationship with them). They are running five community-run health and wellbeing centres that seemed to be using the same model we developed at Sunlight. And they’re using medical students to deliver mobile health clinics as part of a more vocational and experiential curriculum.

At Zip Zap circus we were treated to range of performances that wouldn’t have looked out of place at any international arts platform. They put on a whole programme of events and use the income to create opportunities for any young person aged 7-18 to attend circus training for free in areas including performance, lighting, costume, administration, stage management and marketing. Over 150 young people, mainly from the townships are supported each year. There’s a few lessons here for UK arts organisations who are going to be facing severe challenges and could benefit, I’m sure, from a bit of Zip Zap inspiration. I’m hoping that a new relationship can be developed with our own social enterprise circuses here in the UK – namely No Fit State Circus who performed at VOICE 10 and Circus Space here in London.

Exploring a township

And so we learned, we shared, we contributed and we left. Inspired, energised and networked to exhaustion, but with a really grounded sense of the local and global challenges we collectively face. It felt great to leave with a mountain of new ideas of how we can continue to transfer innovative solutions across national boundaries and build the social enterprise movement not only here in the UK but worldwide too.

Thankfully my fears about South Africa from my first airport transfer were mostly misplaced, although there is clearly still much to be done culturally, structurally and legislatively to shift South Africa’s position as one of the most unequal societies on earth.

I look forward to reporting back on next year’s forum, taking place in Rio…!

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »